Joe Ianora

Joe Ianora is principal of Del Amigo High School in California. Previously, he was principal of San Ramon Valley High School for nearly a decade.

Curriculum Pacing – are we focused on coverage or learning?

The high school where I work is gearing up for our WASC (Western Association of Schools and Colleges) accreditation in the late spring. This process gives us the opportunity to have some much needed dialogue about the Why, How, and What in terms of student learning. We are in the emerging stage of the PLC process and are still working toward a common understanding in many areas. In addition to these meetings, most of my day is spent working with teenagers who are stressed out. Among the many things they say to me, one really sticks out in regards to our PLC process…their anxiety level rises dramatically when a teacher communicates that there is only a short amount of time they can dedicate to a particular concept because they have to cover too much material.

During one of our WASC meetings, an 11th grade student was commenting on the high levels of stress they were dealing with. When I asked if there was something specific, they shared with me this comment (paraphrased) by a teacher: “Even though you haven’t learned this yet, we can only spend 2 days on it, and we will NOT be able to come back to it because there are too many other things we need to cover before the semester is over.” The next day, I was in a meeting with another teacher who was expressing frustration at the fact that they had to cover so much more material before the semester ends with no time to properly review.

My job as a Support Counselor is to help students be able to manage their stress in healthy and productive ways; and as a PLC Associate, I can’t help but think about how different our school will be once we master a shift of practice from teaching to one of learning. This is not an indictment of my school; rather, I think most teachers across our nation feel as though they are rushing through their curriculum to some unseen finish line.

Reviewing the literature on Mindset research and applying it to the PLC process, it becomes crystal clear that we need to shift our thinking from Teaching to Learning. We can do this by starting with the question of “why”. Why is it necessary to get through this curriculum by a certain date? What is more important – getting through a specific amount of curriculum regardless of what is learned or learning the material before we move on?

One of the first things I recommend to all schools starting their PLC journey is to first make a commitment to focus on learning. This sounds very simple, but “old habits die hard” and this can be very complicated. Many teachers are well-meaning and very much want students to learn at high levels, but often feel very constrained by the amount of curriculum that needs to be covered. Lucky for us, the PLC journey is incredibly astute and has already figured out how to help succeed in this endeavor.

An easy way for all teachers to start this process, besides simply fighting over Essential Question #1 (What do we want the students to be able to know and do?), is to put the curriculum into three major categories (Wiggins and McTighe 1998):

1.       Enduring understanding

2.       Important to know

3.       Worth being familiar with

These three categories, coupled with your state and district guidelines, can help focus teacher dialogue so that student learning becomes that primary focus. Ensuring students learn at high levels is not just a “pie in the sky” idea, it is done through a continued, unrelenting focus on closing the gap between implemented curriculum (what is taught) and attained curriculum (what is learned). This gap between implemented and attained is what my 11th grade student was talking about when they shared how stressed out they were. I have found that when teachers coordinate curriculum, they are merely pacing out a timeline of coverage. When using the three categories mentioned above, teachers are able to dialogue and decide what goes into category 1, 2 or 3. This shift moves a teacher’s thinking from “I taught it, they didn’t learn it” to “if they didn’t learn it, I didn’t teach it”. This shift can often help us refocus from a timeline of coverage to a focus on essential learning. A focus on the essential learning is how we help all students learn at high levels.

Comments

Raymond Singletary

Hi Joe!

Thanks for sharing information time. As a content (Mathematics) Supervisor, who creates curriculum pacing guides, I hear this concern often. I agree the amount of standards within a grade level can be daunting, however I believe what makes it daunting is the team's ability understand the questions you mentioned in your post. Identifying the enduring understandings, the need to know, and the ideas worth being familiar with will help teams prioritize which items to spend more time on and which might need less. As a curriculum writer, I can assist with this process, so I will keep this in mind as I continue to develop my own abilities in this area.

Thanks,
Ray Singletary
raysingletary1/Twitter

Posted on

Joseph Ianora

Hello Kendra,

Thank you for your question. This is actually a very difficult one, because people can argue back and forth between enduring versus important. I think an additional question that can be asked if you're stuck between those two places could be, will it help them in future classes? Or will this information/skill only benefit them in my classroom or with my curriculum? If the skill or knowledge will be used in the future I would say it is enduring and therefore a critical skill to be taught.

Posted on

Joseph Ianora

Hello Rebecca,
thank you for your post. It is frustrating sometimes to reach the end of the year and feel like you may not have covered enough content. I dialogue with my colleagues around painting the picture of the ideal student, what skills they need to be able to know and/or do by the end of their time with me. Once we build all of the essential skills and knowledge, it becomes easier to put a timeline on those pieces. Once we have the timeline we can balance that up against are the students learning those essential skills can we either speed up, or slow down based on their learning.
Best of luck.

Posted on

Joseph Ianora

Hello Britney,

Thank you very much for your comments on my article. You are correct, dialoguing with your peers regarding curriculum can be a frustrating process. Using these three levels of understanding can sometimes turn a subjective conversation into one that uses objective standards. This can often help the team make critical decisions around what needs to be taught. The second part of that conversation can be a bit more difficult, because it focuses on what needs to be taught, when… And, if students didn't learn it do we move on or go back and reteach. This shift from teaching to learning can sometimes be a difficult change process, but if you stick with it it becomes easier.

Posted on

Britney Hopkins

Joe,
I am in my fifth year of teaching. I have taught at a public charter school and currently teach a traditional community public school. I have always struggled with balancing following the a curriculum map and ensuring that my students have mastered the skills covered. Your article has given me the clarity and capacity to not only articulate my frustration with this issue but to articulate the shift that needs to take place as well. I feel compelled to share with my peers that as a school, our focus needs to shift together from what's being taught to what is being learned.
Posing the "Why is it necessary to get through this curriculum by a certain date? What is more important - getting through a specific amount of curriculum regardless of what is learned or learning the material before we move on?" will serve as the catalyst in this shift in focus.
I am looking forward to sitting down with my team, sifting and sorting through the curriculum and putting them into the three major catergories that you have mentioned in your article: 1) enduring understandings 2) important to know 3) worth being familiar with. My mind begins to ponder how we will address planning and implementing the curriculum based on the catergory that it falls into. I am excited for the engaging learning experiences and collaborative opportunities for both my peers and students that will come about because of this shift in thinking.
Thanks!

Posted on

Britney Hopkins

Joe,
Your arcticle really struck a cord with me. I am in my 5th year of teaching and I have taught as a classroom teacher in two different schools over the course of my career. My first teaching position was at a public charter school and my current one is at a traditional community public school. I have always struggled balancing racing the clock to ensure that I was following a curriculum map and making sure my students were actually mastering concepts and retaining knowledge. Reading your article provided me with much needed clarity and capacity to articulate my frustration with focusing on the coverage of curriculum verses learning.
I honestly feel empowered to tackle this issue at my school right away. By applying Mindset research to the PLC process (which my school is currently starting, so the timing is perfect!) it will be appealing to my peers to shift our school's focus as a whole from what's being taught to what is being learned. Posing the questions, "Why is it necessary to get through this curriculum by a certain date?" What is more important - getting through a specific amount of curriculum regardless of what is learned or learning the materila before we move on?" will be a catalyst to trigger this shift in thinking.
I am looking forward to sitting down with my departmental team and having the opportunity to sift and sort through our curriculum and put them into the categories of enduring understanding; important to know; and worth being familiar with. My mind has even begin to ponder how the way will address teaching the curriculum depending on which category it falls in. Engaging learning experiences and collaborative opportunities for both my peers can be the norm at my school one day and it will all start in the shift of our thinking from teaching to learning.
Thanks!

Posted on

Kendra Divine

Great advice. Our school is in a similar situation as the one you describe. As we also shift towards mastery learning, the three given categories can help our dialogue to stay focused on the necessities. How would you suggest teacher leaders help their colleagues limit category 2 (important to know) from category 1 (enduring understanding)?

Posted on

Rebecca Morrison

I can definitely relate to this article. At my school, one teacher is dead set on finishing the textbook by the end of the school year, but students leave her classroom stressed and unprepared for unit assessments. They don't feel that they have really learned anything. I tend toward the opposite approach; sometimes I take too long to complete a unit just so I'm sure the students have mastered the concepts. However, at the end of the year, I am usually left feeling as though I have done my students a disservice, somehow, for not covering all the expected content. I appreciate the encouragement to move from a focus on "a timeline of coverage to a focus on essential learning."

Posted on